Project analysis as input to public debate: Environmental valuation versus physical unit indicators
نویسندگان
چکیده
Monetary valuation of environmental change is useful if one aims to rank alternative projects according to some specific social welfare function. However, if the project analysis is intended as background information to a democratic debate, the advantages of monetary valuation are less obvious. This paper analyzes aggregation of information, taking normative disagreement explicitly into account. It is demonstrated that monetary valuation is not always more informative than a physical unit measure of environmental change. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: A11; D61; D78; D83; H43
منابع مشابه
Effects of Hadi Project Implementation on the Resilience of Rural Settlements in Oraman, Sarvabad
INTRODUCTION: Resilience is recognized as the potential capacity of a system or community to adapt or resist change in order to maintain an appropriate level of performance and structure. Moreover, governments adopt a variety of strategies to mitigate the effects of natural disasters. In this regard, the rural Hadi project is an efficient method for rural physical management. The present study...
متن کاملPricing environmental externalities in the power sector: ethical limits and implications for social choice
During the last decade, a series of valuation studies have made attempts at estimating the external environmental costs of various power generation sources. The purposes of this paper are: (a) to explore some of the ethical limits of the economic valuation of environmental impacts; and (b) to analyze what the implications are of these limits for the social choice between different electric powe...
متن کاملModified-Decoupled Net Present Value: The Intersection of Valuation and Time scaling of Risk in Energy Sector
Although the practical importance of investment analysis in long-term energy investments is well understood, choosing the proper method has always been a dilemma. In this regard, classic evaluation methods, with a history of almost a century, are mostly favored, but using them in the valuation of long-lasting energy projects has particular shortcomings, nevertheless. The drawbacks mainly stem f...
متن کاملMeasurement Issues and Validity Tests for Using Attitude Indicators in Contingent Valuation Research
Employing attitude measures to explain valuation responses in contingent valuation studies has the potential to improve statistical analyses as well as interpretation of response information. In this paper, four types of attitude measures are compared for their ability to provide these benefits in the context of a contingent valuation of an air quality management plan for Sofia, Bulgaria. Findi...
متن کاملValuation in the environmental policy process
Expert valuation, a process used to determine how much stakeholders value eco-system aspects, places experts as intermediaries for public-preference input into the environmental policy process. While the rise and refinement of expert valuation might capture ecosystem values more comprehensively, two dilemmas are also worth of consideration: (1) will expert valuation and benefit cost analysis su...
متن کامل